Thanks for the well though out reply, Brent! I really appreciate your taking the time to write that post. I completely agree with you; your thoughts definitely echo mine when it comes to how I view the creative process. As you’ve stated; there will always be those who are just fine with taking the standard shots and I’m totally fine with that! Heck I even still do it from time to time. I think that what it comes down to is how you want your work to be remembered. Thanks again for the feedback. It’s been really cool seeing your work develop over the years, keep it up man. Lots of great and inspiring imagery!

I think that shooting the “postcard” or “bucket list shots” shots have value to some extent, even outside of sales and marketing. I certainly have a lot of those shots. If you’re actually at an iconic location in person and you know THE standard composition, you can walk around there and look at all kinds of different compositions and learn about the thought process and what compositional elements make up the famous shots, and then apply what you’ve learned there to other photographs in other locations. I consider myself fairly new to photography, and I think it’s a great way of learning. However, I think I too am getting to the point where I’m a little tired of always seeing the same compositions (though I’ll probably still shoot from the bridge when I go to Zion or Reflection Lakes in Rainier, etc for the experience). I can tell from your work that you are clearly past this point. Now is when you can apply the things you learned from the past toward your own unique work.

Everyone also has different goals with their photography. Some people want to create unique original art and make a statement. Others are perfectly content with visiting beautiful natural places and wake up early sometimes to take a pretty photograph. The artist’s intent is not always clear when you’re just scrolling through social media seeing picture after picture of the same locations. To answer your question about “how to break free from that mindset?”… I think the creative artist naturally will – as you’ve done, they may look at other art with some amount of disdain and try to avoid doing the same thing others have done. They’ll want to show the world their own unique take on things. Others simply don’t have that drive, and that’s ok too.

All in all, I’m with you. Just thought I’d share more thoughts on the matter.

I couldn’t agree more, Patrick! What drives me crazy is that all of these people go to these destinations and come away with the same shots! If you’re going to travel somewhere and leave a carbon footprint doing it, at least try to be original and come away with something that is meaningful to you and the progression of the field. There’s definitely nothing wrong with staying close to home. There’s still so many areas that I still need to check out in the PNW. All in due time. I think sustainable landscape photography practices are the only thing that will save the landscapes that we enjoy for generations to come.

I feel your pain. What drives me crazy, even more than seeing the same compositions from all of the famous spots, is the fact that hoards of photographers criss-cross the planet (Iceland, Patagonia, Norway, etc.) to get these shots. A flight such as this will release about 2-3 tons of CO2 into the atmosphere. I have read reports from photo workshops claiming things like: “our caravan of seven SUV’s logged 2000 miles this week chasing light across 3 states…). We all need to consider the impact that travel has on the planet. I am not saying that we should all just stay home – only that we make a conscious effort to shoot more locally. Most of us have plenty of subjects and compositions nearby to keep us busy for a lifetime.

-Patrick McDonald